LITHIUM VALUATION

Lithium Americas (LAC) & Lithium Argentina (LAR)

Following their 2023 separation, we analyze the distinct paths of Thacker Pass (LAC) and Caucharí‑Olaroz (LAR) to highlight risks, ramp-up, and valuation drivers.

Leverage Futures Independent Research

LAC/LAR: Project Timing, Cost Curves, and Lithium Price Sensitivity

This note compares a U.S. development-stage asset (LAC) versus an Argentina operating ramp (LAR). We focus on project execution, jurisdictional risk, and how realized lithium prices translate into equity value.

Coverage

NYSE: LAC / NYSE: LAR

Report Type

Cross-Company Pair Note

Primary Lens

Execution + Price Sensitivity

Base Horizon

2026E-2035E

Core Thesis

  • LAC upside is largest if Thacker Pass ramps on budget and schedule.
  • LAR has earlier cash-flow visibility but higher sovereign and FX exposure.
  • Both equities remain highly leveraged to long-term lithium pricing assumptions.

Catalysts

  • Ramp milestones, nameplate utilization, and realized cost trajectory.
  • Permitting, financing cadence, and partner structure changes.
  • Lithium spot and contract pricing trend versus incentive price levels.

Primary Risks

  • Capex overrun or commissioning delay for development phases.
  • Policy and macro instability impacting export economics.
  • Prolonged weak lithium prices compressing returns and valuation multiples.

Valuation Approach

  • Price-to-earnings and cash-flow logic tied to per-ton margin assumptions.
  • Separate input stacks for LAC and LAR to reflect distinct asset profiles.
  • Sensitivity framework for production, costs, tax, and discount rate.

For information purposes only, not investment advice.

LAC/LAR Long-Form Pair Wiki

An extended reference note comparing development-stage and operating-stage lithium exposure. Use this as context before applying assumptions in the valuation appendix.

1. Pair Thesis Overview

The LAC/LAR pair represents two different ways to express a long-term lithium view: one via development and construction execution (LAC), and one via operating ramp and country risk management (LAR). Both are highly sensitive to realized price paths, but timing and risk vectors differ materially.

2. Corporate Split Context

After the corporate separation, each entity became more transparent but also more exposed to single-asset concentration. This increases analytical clarity while reducing diversification benefits that previously softened project-specific volatility.

3. LAC Asset Profile (Thacker Pass)

LAC is mainly a project execution story. Value creation depends on commissioning timeline, capex control, and the pace at which operating metrics approach design assumptions.

  • Upside path: on-time ramp with disciplined capex and improving unit costs.
  • Downside path: schedule slippage and higher financing burden before cash generation.

4. LAR Asset Profile (Cauchari-Olaroz)

LAR offers earlier production visibility but introduces greater macro complexity through jurisdictional, currency, and policy channels. Operational consistency and cost stability are key for sustained market confidence.

5. Lithium Price Framework

Price assumptions are the dominant valuation variable. Rather than relying on a single long-term number, this wiki uses bands linked to incentive pricing, project economics, and cycle duration.

The practical approach is to test multiple price regimes and evaluate whether each company's capital structure can absorb prolonged weak periods.

6. Cost Curve and Margins

Unit margins should be evaluated against all-in sustaining economics, not only cash costs. During weak price periods, small cost differences can create large divergence in equity outcomes.

  • Operating cost variance by processing route and recovery assumptions.
  • Energy, reagent, logistics, and labor inflation exposure.
  • Royalty/tax structure influence on realized equity margin.

7. Financing and Balance Sheet

Funding path is critical for both companies. Equity dilution, partner structures, debt terms, and staged capex timing all influence per-share value more than headline NPV figures suggest.

8. Scenario Matrix

Scenario Lithium Price Regime LAC Read-Through LAR Read-Through
Bull Sustained high incentive-supportive pricing. High operating leverage to successful ramp. Strong cash generation and faster balance-sheet improvement.
Base Moderate pricing with cyclical volatility. Value depends on execution quality and financing discipline. Stable operations with uneven quarterly realized prices.
Bear Prolonged weak pricing environment. Higher financing/dilution pressure before full ramp. Margin compression with greater macro-policy sensitivity.

9. Monitoring Checklist

  • Construction and commissioning milestones versus prior guidance.
  • Cash cost and realized pricing spread trends by quarter.
  • Funding updates, partner changes, and capital-structure revisions.
  • Policy, currency, and logistics developments in operating regions.

10. Risks and Method Notes

The largest errors usually come from overconfidence in single-point price assumptions and underestimation of execution timelines. This long-form wiki is meant to keep the model anchored to explicit drivers and scenario discipline.

Document intent: independent research context for model users. Not investment advice.

Model Status: Coverage is in active build-out. Inputs and operating assumptions are updated as project-level disclosures are released.

LAC: Powering America's EV Future from Nevada

Lithium Americas (LAC) controls the Thacker Pass project in Nevada, one of the largest known lithium resources in the U.S. The asset is strategically positioned to support the North American EV supply chain and may benefit from U.S. policy incentives. Key watch items include project execution, capital intensity, and the pace of ramp-up.

LAR: Tapping the Heart of the Lithium Triangle

Lithium Argentina (LAR) operates the Caucharí‑Olaroz brine operation in the Lithium Triangle. The site is already producing and focused on stable ramp-up and potential expansions. Investors should track operating costs, FX and sovereign risk, and the company’s capital allocation priorities.

Company overview comparison
Feature LAC (Lithium Americas) LAR (Lithium Argentina)
Ticker NYSE:LAC NYSE:LAR
Jurisdiction 🇺🇸 USA (Nevada) 🇦🇷 Argentina
Primary Asset Thacker Pass Caucharí-Olaroz
Stage Development Production / Ramp-up
Key Opportunity IRA Benefits, Strategic Scale Proven Production, Expansion
Primary Risk Project Execution & CAPEX Geopolitical & Economic

Model Appendix

Interactive LAC/LAR Valuation Model

Adjust lithium price, production, cost, and capital assumptions to compare implied value for both companies.

NYSE:LAC & NYSE:LAR Valuation Calculator

Lithium Price Assumptions
LAC (Thacker Pass) Assumptions

* Corporate Presentation, Q2 2025 – C1 OPEX Years 1–25

LAR (Caucharí-Olaroz) Assumptions

* Q2 2025 Results release

LAC Results

Valuation results based on assumptions (Unit: USD, tonne)
NYSE: LAC
Margin per tonne (pre-tax)
Projected EPS (pre-tax)
Target Share Price

LAR Results

Valuation results based on assumptions (Unit: USD, tonne)
NYSE: LAR
Margin per tonne (pre-tax)
Projected EPS (pre-tax)
Target Share Price

AI CHATBOT

LAC / LAR AI Assistant

Ask about lithium valuation assumptions, DCF drivers, and LAC/LAR scenario differences.